On the Cover

Sunil Joshi, NeotelSunil Joshi, Neotel


SA’s mobile duopoly could be eyeing the company

While talk of a buyout has had the rumour mill turning for years, recent reports have heightened the hearsay, with SA’s two main mobile rivals, and , tagged as being in the running.

However, with neither the mobile operators, nor the SNO, willing to entertain the hypothetical hum surrounding the future of – whose majority shareholder is India’s Tata Communications (68.5%) – the industry is left to speculate.

While the notion of a mobile operator buying a fixed-line business may seem incongruous in one of the fastest-growing mobile countries in the world, analysts say such an acquisition would make sense for a number of reasons.

, still relatively insignificant in comparison to ’s empire, has two assets that would significantly boost either or ’s enterprise units and infrastructure reach – an enterprise customer base and extensive fibre network.

CEO reported at the end of May that the company’s core customer base – the enterprise sector – was up 29% year-on-year, while what he classifies as the company’s consumer customers (small business and retail) had grown 52%.

While the numbers may pale in comparison to ’s four million-odd customers, analysts say ’s base of 3 000 business and 152 000 consumer customers would not go amiss for the mobile operators, who have both recently intensified efforts to bolster their respective enterprise units, with a sharp focus on the SME sector.

At the same time, and as part of their enterprise strategies, both and have been making a play for fixed-mobile convergence solutions in enterprise.

, which has spent about R5 billion on infrastructure since inception, has access to about 12 000km of fibre, 6 500km of which is in metro areas. The operator also has space on all of SA’s five submarine cables, which give it access to Tata’s 365 000km of underwater fibre, connecting 300 cities in 200 countries across six continents.

BUYOUT BENEFITS

, head of ICT, Africa, at Frost & Sullivan, says the consulting firm has not seen or heard any confirmation to support reports that and are in the process of bidding for an acquisition of – but says the mobile entities’ interest in the company would not be surprising.

has just turned earnings before interest and taxes positive (EBIT), and is showing positive growth. [An acquisition] would place the purchaser in a position to target larger segments of the enterprise market with a more diverse offering range, including fixed mobile converged solutions.”

Furthermore, says Duvenage, a sale would put the purchaser in the opposite position to where is at the moment, where the company is trying to grow market share in the mobile environment, and have a very well established client base on the fixed-voice, data and services side. “If one of the operators purchases , they would be trying to build on the fixed side with a well-entrenched presence in the mobile side.”

MD of notes that, for regulatory reasons, it is unlikely that or would be among the bidders should be up for sale, but cites the company’s customer base and extensive fibre infrastructure as attractive gains for any telecoms entity in the running.

Hypothetically speaking, should or acquire , Goldstuck says SA would see a fixed-mobile service added to consumer options, “but more importantly, an aggressive move into fibre provision to businesses”.

“There are two wins to be had: a substantial urban fibre infrastructure, and a powerful business customer base.”

analyst says the sale of , although unlikely to materialise in its entirety, would place or in a position to expand their enterprise base. “There is only so much mobile can do for you on the enterprise side. Fixed-mobile convergence would certainly be one of the motivations for interest in the company.”

Chireka says ’s services have historically been steeped in fixed-wireless access provision, without much of a mobile offering. “Their services offer a degree of mobility, but they don’t have a standalone mobile offering, so the suggestion that and are interested makes sense in that it would boost both sides. But I think Tata would want to keep the wholesale side of the business, and perhaps consider selling the retail side.”

Ultimately, she says, the prize for a winning bidder would be twofold – ’s fibre infrastructure and its enterprise customer base.

Africa Analysis analyst " rel=tag>Dobek Pater says the implications of a sale would depend on which entity would end up buying . For , and Internet Solutions – which has also previously been touted as a prospective buyer – Pater says three key aspects are attractive in .

“[These are], to varied degrees, spectrum, infrastructure and wholesale/enterprise customer base. It would mean that the buyer would be able to: use the additional spectrum to deploy a national long-term evolution network (without having to refarm the 1800MHz spectrum in the case of the mobile operators); quickly expand its enterprise customer base (this would be of lesser importance to Internet Solutions, which already has an extensive corporate customer base); and quickly expand its fixed-line footprint – metro/access fibre, national long-haul and international capacity.” The last factor, says Pater, may be of most significance to Internet Solutions, which has the smallest amount of its own infrastructure.

“Ultimately, the operator that controls access to the client (through infrastructure) is strategically positioned to control the services delivered to that end user. All of the above would allow the buyer to become more competitive in the enterprise market, especially against the large service providers such as and Internet Solutions.”

Ovum analyst is also dubious as to the rumours of a buyout, but says ’s assets in the form of its fibre network and enterprise customers would prove to be “very attractive” to either or .

Hurst notes: “I think it’s safe to say that businesses will always be looking at further investment and thus a change in equity status is a natural course of an enterprise’s life. Right now the speculation of a sale of and its equity is nothing more than speculation. We have had various announcements from the majority shareholder Tata Communications that it would not be selling its stake. Tata Communications executives have indicated in the past that they are extremely happy with the operation and have referred to SA as their second home.”

SHAREHOLDER STAKES

In terms of shareholder impetus behind the possible sale of , analysts say the company’s main shareholder, Tata Communications, also stands to benefit.

Over the last three years, Tata has increased its effective stake in to 68.5% in a consolidated manner after it increasingly acquired shares from other partners in the joint venture. ’s other owners include Tata Africa, CommuniTel ( Namibia) and Nexus.

Goldstuck says has represented a drain on both financial and strategic resources. “Although it has turned the corner, it will probably be some years before there is a return on investment. Making a profit from an early exit would probably be an attractive option.”

The first five years of operation, he notes, saw accumulating losses, “which have probably added up to a significant burden on the parent company. We see Tata as this global giant with endless resources, but it is a company with $2.6 billion turnover, which makes it smaller than our major mobile operators. While its parent company, the Tata Group, is a $100 billion conglomerate, the subsidiary has to perform in its own right within the group, and there may well be pressure from a higher level for it to turn a profit in SA.”

Pater mirrors the sentiment, saying: “ is not yet profi table (on a net profit basis) and will not be, given its loans, I suspect. It would have to commit quite a bit more investment, in order to remain competitive in the market. It would probably be another few years before became profitable on a net basis. Tata may not be prepared to wait that long and the end result is not guaranteed.”

However, from a strategic perspective, Pater says he finds it surprising that Tata would want to dispose of its shareholding if the company wishes to remain and grow in Africa, unless it is eying another investment in Africa in the hope it would be more profitable.

has been expanding into other southern African markets, providing connectivity services to South African corporates, and in that sense expanding the global Tata operations.”

Duvenage says, depending on the structure of the agreement, a sale could place Tata in a position to access broader markets. “By being involved with or , it could place the new partnership in a unique position to have price advantages across that board, with the reach of Tata globally, and the coverage and growth of the mobile operator locally.”

He says, as far as itself goes, the deal might present an opportunity for the company, providing more access to market, and a wider product range to co-develop solutions for the local market.

Hurst presents a slightly different point of view. He says, while the sale of would give Tata a cash injection, it would also be contrary to their strategy of being able to deliver their enterprise and carrier grade services in emerging markets.

“[A sale] also seems odd after having gone through extensive investment required to get the operation profitable and generating cash. To sell it seems to indicate that there must be an alternative motive.”

PERSISTENT PROGRESS

While does not disclose revenue, the company’s latest annual financial presentation painted a positive picture of its position in the market.

reported positive operating income for the year to March, hitting one of the milestones on the way to profitability, for the first time since launch. In May, the operator said it had turned EBIT positive, and was now aiming to be positive on a pre-tax basis by year-end. recorded revenue growth of 12% for the year to March, while earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) increased 531% over the same period.

At the time, Joshi said the company, which had been EBITDA positive for the past seven quarters, now aims to focus on becoming profitable before tax.

He noted that, amid what he says is a competitive environment fraught with uncertainty, managed to surpass the industry growth rate. “ continues to capture market share. While the fixed-line telecommunications market in SA is projected to grow at 1.4% per annum until 2018, is growing at more than eight times this rate.”

Goldstuck says the fact that has invested billions, and that it has become operationally profi table, is evidence that the company is both sustainable and making a meaningful contribution to the communications environment in SA. “’s long-term potential is huge as it continues to grow, even if slowly.”

In December last year, iWeek reported that was slowly but surely starting to eat into ’s market share. Having started out with little more than a laptop and a handful of staff, today employs around 1 000 people and is able to offer communication services to SA’s wholesale, enterprise and consumer segments.

Goldstuck says is a viable choice for businesses – making it a threat to ’s business division – a highly competitive unit in its own right.

Hurst says has a meaningful role to play in the South African telecoms landscape, both currently and in the longer term. “The company has brought competition to the market although this has been felt more in the enterprise market than the consumer base right now. “ has invested in fibre networks around the country and has contributed to the overall lowering of the cost of bandwidth.

Going forward, is expected to play a role in the country’s ongoing investment into fibre and capacity and a possible increase in the content delivery market as well as continuing to grow their enterprise base. In addition, as enterprises begin to shift their ICT spend to the cloud, will play a vital role in being able to provision bandwidth to customers, along with their competitors.”

Pater says, while is a serious competitor, this can only be said for certain market segments. “I don’t think the operator has become much of a viable alternative in the consumer market, as its infrastructure is still very limited (although targeting mostly the high end areas of the consumer market).

“However, in the wholesale space and enterprise, it is a fairly serious competitor and its ability to compete (for example on infrastructure wholesale) would improve with the commercial launch of the national long distance network.”

Duvenage says, while has gradually been taking market share, the operator is continuously challenged by other industry players – especially in the enterprise space, in which the company predominantly operates. “The pressure on Enterprise should see become more aggressive.

has most certainly made some inroads in brand recognition and is well recognised as a serious player in the South African market.”

MARKET CHALLENGE

Despite the challenges it faces on an ongoing basis, and rumours of a buyout, continues to strive for market share Joshi says if continues to gain more than a percent of the market a year, it will make its target of between 14% and 16% of market share by the 2016/17 financial year. has also upped its consumer game with several products targeted specifically at that segment, and continues to build up its network.

However, the initial expectation was that would gain 15% of ’s customer base within five years of its launch, a target it has failed to achieve, despite ’s declining fixed lines.

Analysts say, amid the highlycompetitive landscape operates in, gaining market share will be no mean feat.

Goldstuck says, as it stands, 15% of the market by 2017 “does not yet look doable” for . While has become a significant brand for business, he says, it is not yet a strong enough brand to come up automatically as an option when consumers are discussing alternatives.

Hurst says is doing “exceptionally well” in driving efficiencies in the business and is very focussed on winning customers in the enterprise space and, if the goal of 15% speaks to its enterprise customers, and the operator continues on its current path - 15% will be attainable. However, acquiring 15% of the total market will prove difficult. “I think the consumer segment may prove to be their weakness.”

Likewise, Pater says if is aiming for 15% of the entire market, “it is difficult to see how could account for 15% in revenue terms. It would mean that it would have to grow its revenue almost seven-fold over the next three to four years. If we only look at the wholesale and fixed market segments, would still have to triple its revenue.”

He says the challenge lies in the fact that is not the only operator looking for a larger market share. “Other large operators also plan to grow – or at least defend – their current territory. They will not easily give up market share.”

At the end of the day, say analysts, whether rumours turn out to be just that – or materialise into a merger or acquisition – the investment and contribution has made since August 2006 will remain a key part of the local telecoms landscape.